dgghalib Aftab Ahmad Cheema Nasir khan durrani IqbalMehmood khan-baig-150x150 Zulfiqar Ahmad Shohaib suddle Nawaz Sharif Nawaz Sharif Pir

( As I see it ) Peter Marshall Police Commissioner New Zealand

Posted by on May 30, 2013 | Comments Off on ( As I see it ) Peter Marshall Police Commissioner New Zealand

peter-marshall

Lessons learned from Operation 8

May 22, 2013

Previous Blogs
Peter Marshall
The Independent Police Conduct Authority has released its report on Operation 8, the investigation into criminal activity in Te Urewera National Park and elsewhere.

The report is critical of some police actions. We accept its findings and have already made significant changes to address many of the issues noted. However, the report confirms the investigation was a “reasonable and necessary” response to the serious criminal activity being undertaken.

It also exposes myths that have become accepted as fact since the events of October 2007. For example, armed police officers did not search a bus full of köhanga reo children, and officers did not set up a roadblock on the confiscation line. The report acknowledges the targets of the operation were not exclusively Tühoe or indeed Mäori. Those are welcome comments.

The authority faults us over roadblocks at Ruatoki and Taneatua and the way officers interacted with members of the public they stopped. Likewise, our interactions with people at five of the 41 properties searched fell short of the required standard. We accept this, and that Police underestimated the affect of the operation on Ruatoki and Tühoe. I apologise for the impact on innocent residents of the RuatokiValley and elsewhere.

Without making any excuses, it’s important to remember the context. The IPCA says the threat was “real and potentially serious”, and acknowledges the “huge logistical challenge” of the police response.

We’ve made many changes to operational policies and practices since 2007, with the most significant following the passage of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012. This clarified the law in this area and has diminished the likelihood of similar problems arising again.

We’ll take time to work through the Authority’s recommendations in detail. I’ll oversee their implementation and will do everything I can to ensure the right policies, procedures and training are in place.

We look forward to continuing to work with members of the community in Ruatoki and elsewhere to build and strengthen the trust which underpins our mission to make New Zealand safer for all who live or visit here.http://www.police.govt.nz/

shifts-in-recorded-crime-2012-580px

crime-by-numbers-2012-580px

Crime Statistics for calendar year ending 31 December 2012

Released April 2, 2013

2012 Calendar Year Crime Statistics – Questions and Answers

Introduction

Statistics reported in this document are derived from the Police National Intelligence Application (N.I.A) These Official Crime Statistics present a snapshot of data in N.I.A. relating to offences within a given year, as at the date 14 days following the end of that year.

An incident that is reported to or detected by Police where Police believe an offence is likely to have been committed is counted as a Recorded Offence.  A Recorded Offence is considered to be a Resolved Offence by Police when an offender is identified and dealt with (warned, cautioned, prosecuted, etc).

Resolution Rate is the percentage of Recorded Offences that are resolved within the calendar year.

Southern District Stats for the calendar year to 31 December 2012 [ PDF 182 KB]

For more Information click here:

http://www.police.govt.nz/statistics/2012/calendar

Advertisement

Subscription

You can subscribe by e-mail to receive news updates and breaking stories.